Auditor modeQ3 FY2027Sample · 50 contracts
Read-only · 87d remaining
▣ Grant activeGranted by Revenue Controller · 2026-04-15· Sample: stratified by transaction price · 50 of 412Filter: confidence ≤ medium · 18 results

NorthStar Order Form #2027-0481 — judgment audit trail

PO-2 onboarding distinctness · medium confidence · accepted by the controller · cryptographically anchored to Sigstore Rekor
Sample size
50 / 412
stratified by transaction price
Medium / low confidence
18 / 2
vs 412 total · 4.4% / 0.5%
Overrides applied
11
all with structured reason · 0 unexplained
Verifications passed
412 / 412
Merkle proof valid · Rekor anchored

PO-2 distinctness · CISC self-consistency trace

CISC · 5 samples · agreement 0.84
model · claude-opus-4-7prompt · distinctness-saas-v1.4temperature · 0.0top_p · 1.0retrieval k · 3 chunksverifier · gpt-judge-v1.2
Sample 1 · distinct · over_time
Two-prong test under ASC 606-10-25-19 met. Customer can benefit standalone (configured environment + migrated data); separately identifiable (generic integration vs platform customization).
Sample 2 · distinct · over_time
Onboarding services produce a configured-environment output independent from subscription license. Third-party implementer market exists; ASC 606-10-25-21 factors weigh against bundling.
Sample 3 · distinct · point_in_time
Output (configured tenant + data migration) transfers control at go-live. ASC 606-10-25-30 control criteria met at customer acceptance.
Sample 4 · bundled (dissent)
Could be argued onboarding is highly interrelated with subscription — without it, subscription has limited utility. Dissent on factor (b) of distinctness test.
Sample 5 · distinct · point_in_time
Concur with point-in-time at go-live. Variable consideration constraint not applicable; fixed fee.
Aggregation: 4 of 5 samples conclude distinct · CISC weighted-vote score 0.84 (medium confidence) · point-in-time pattern 3 of 5 · routed to controller for ratification per the routing rule (≥0.7 medium confidence).